soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: The "Grooming Gangs" of UK, Islam & Pakistani Muslims
·
In Reply To
deletejuice
·
3/15/2025, 7:15:33 PM
·
permalink
In my post, I have already presented my arguments on - 1\. why an uncaused existence must exist out of necessity 2\. why the universe or multiverse cannot be this uncaused necessary existence You are responding but you haven't gone through them. If you are sincere, you can go through them, find the issue and then respond with that. Again, I am not referring to any religion or a specific "god" of a religion, so it's no use to bring religion into the picture. I can make the exact same arguments from a Deistic position and it wouldn't make any difference. Furthermore, you have made a couple of strange claims which go against the established scientific and logical principles for which the burden of proof, again, lies on you - 1\. we don't live in a logical universe 2\. non-newtonian fluids don't follow the laws of physics Quick refutations of both - 1\. If we truly didn't live in a logical universe, then logic, mathematics, and science would be utterly useless. The very statement “we don’t live in a logical universe” is a logical proposition attempting to convey truth, which is self-contradictory if logic doesn't apply to the universe. 2\. Idk where did you get this one from but non-newtonian fluids most certainly follow the laws of physics and their behavior is described by the Navier-Stokes equations, just like newtonian fluids. They simply don’t follow Newton’s law of viscosity, which is part of their definition. Lastly, we know that pure mathematics can't explain metaphysics which is why my arguments aren't grounded on an emperical evidence but rather on ontological deductive evidence. It's just that this type of reasoning has it's roots in mathematics.
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
braven
·
3/16/2025, 3:18:19 PM
·
permalink
Let me clarify the points you seem to take issue with first. It isn't a lack of sincerity that keeps from answering your point about your uncaused existence. I did answer it. What you are 'attempting' to do is impossible. The English language was not designed to 'prove' things like that. Tough call here. However, I am interested in your ideas, but we might get further if we clear a few things up first. To that end, I will attempt to answer your thoughts on points 1 and 2. 1- We do not live in a logical universe. Logics, mathematics and science do the best they can to use logical thought and implementation to explain those things that can be explained. Some of our existence also deals with illogical patterns that we do not understand at all. Most of our existence deals with non-logical patterns. We do not understand them very well, but they seem to have a pattern but more is yet required to understand it. We do not live in a purely logical universe. This is a non-trivial aspect of our existence, yet there it is. 2 - How would you know if Non-Newtonian fluids, inside the human body, follow the laws of physics? No one knows this. This is an amazing unknown. Anyone pretending to know this stuff is not doing the rest of us much good. Torus fields, plasma crystals and plasma consciousness, etc....inside our body is an entire universe of unknown. So far, I feel like I have gone further than most, if not all, yet I know next to nothing on this subject. It has been an odd journey on that front, and amazing on other fronts. Much to learn. I am willing to flesh this out with you, but most comments of certainty on this subject matter should be met with great skepticism till we nail down some points of contention. Peace.
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
