Comment on ''Bannon warns we’re heading towards ‘national suicide’…'' by thoughtcriminal_1984

modernizedemocracy · 7/10/2025, 12:44:00 PM · permalink

13 bumps

rick · 7/10/2025, 1:04:51 PM · permalink

5 bumps

modernizedemocracy · 7/10/2025, 11:47:03 PM · permalink

2 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/10/2025, 1:12:11 PM · permalink

6 bumps

modernizedemocracy · 7/10/2025, 11:43:00 PM · permalink

4 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 12:52:49 AM · permalink

2 bumps

rick · 4/25/2025, 5:22:51 PM · permalink

17 bumps

rick · 7/10/2025, 12:10:28 PM · permalink

**Military Production Outsourcing**

The extent of military production outsourcing in the United States is significant and has evolved over time due to economic, strategic, and industrial factors.

The U.S. military has historically relied on a mix of public and private manufacturing for its weapons and ammunition. While government-owned facilities like the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard and Springfield Arsenal played key roles in military production, much of the manufacturing has shifted toward private-sector contracts. This approach leverages the private sector’s ability to achieve economies of scale, as seen with the production of vehicles like the Humvee and small arms like the M4 carbine, which benefit from the broader industrial capacity and expertise of civilian manufacturing.

However, this outsourcing model has raised concerns, particularly in times of large-scale conflict when the demand for munitions and equipment surges beyond peacetime capacity. Private companies are often reluctant to invest in infrastructure for short-term military contracts, which can lead to bottlenecks in production. During major conflicts such as World War II, the government had to intervene with subsidies and resource controls to ensure adequate production levels.

In recent years, outsourcing has extended beyond manufacturing to include a wide range of services and components, including critical parts sourced from foreign suppliers. The U.S. military’s reliance on Chinese suppliers for certain components has raised alarms among national security experts. This dependence on foreign entities—especially adversaries—has been described as a strategic vulnerability, with the potential to compromise readiness and operational capability.

Moreover, the outsourcing of manufacturing has contributed to a decline in domestic industrial capacity. Much of the work related to munitions and defense systems has been offshored, particularly to countries with lower labor costs and fewer regulatory constraints. This shift has been linked to the broader trend of offshoring in the U.S. manufacturing sector, where over 5 million jobs and 91,000 plants have been lost since 1998.

The Pentagon has also increasingly relied on private military firms (PMFs) for logistics, maintenance, and even operational support. While outsourcing these functions can reduce costs and improve efficiency, it raises concerns about accountability, oversight, and the potential erosion of core military capabilities.

Overall, while outsourcing has provided cost savings and access to industrial expertise, it has also introduced risks related to supply chain security, industrial atrophy, and operational readiness. The U.S. is now undertaking efforts to rebuild domestic manufacturing capacity, particularly in critical areas like semiconductor production and munitions manufacturing, to reduce its reliance on foreign suppliers and ensure it can meet the demands of future conflicts.

8 bumps

rick · 7/10/2025, 12:11:09 PM · permalink

6 bumps

rick · 7/10/2025, 12:12:11 PM · permalink

4 bumps

rick · 7/10/2025, 12:14:39 PM · permalink

2 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 4/25/2025, 5:42:58 PM · permalink

5 bumps

H

hyokkim · 7/10/2025, 9:02:24 AM · permalink

2 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/10/2025, 12:11:20 PM · permalink

1 bump

H

hyokkim · 7/9/2025, 2:20:18 PM · permalink

7 bumps

Signature