Some people who like dogs.......

''Do you want to tell us what dogs ever did to you? :) ''  
  
Nothing too personal yet, except in two cases, a dog chased me off the trail, and a sidewalk; I almost got run over.   The owner of the house had that dog run free off his property with no leash, but after that incident, I didn't see that dog anymore.  
  
''They tend to have a really good sense of people’s personalities....''  
  
I have heard it often, but never witnessed it.     
  
https://abcnews.com/US/leona-helmsleys-dog-trouble-richest-world-dies-12/story?id=13810168  
  
and will often protect the vulnerable.  
  
''....and will often protect the vulnerable.''  
  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVrJyHdTIok  
  
https://www.gulfcoastnewsnow.com/article/chickens-killed-dogs-coop-naples/73174756  
  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCSZQYZ5QbE  
  
https://vetexplainspets.com/why-do-dogs-eat-their-puppies/#  
  
Any other animals that eat their own young, other than pigs?  
  
''I’m a fan of animal protection laws, but I’m not a fan of governments expanding their control and using this as an excuse to infringe on people’s rights.''  
  
Yes, it's the same tactic they have used successfully regarding child welfare, and domestic violence.   When/if I establish new government after the implosion, how a man deals with his wife and raise his children should be a business between them, no one else's.     
  
My issue with these 'traditional conservatives' is that often they will agree that government should not interfere with how parents raise their children, but when 'they' do not agree with how a man deals with his wife or raise his children, they will take offense, and demand government do something!   
  
https://soj.ooo/p/freethinkers/post/c69cb39148da58f0748a6e84ff8d4872  
  
  https://soj.ooo/p/freethinkers/post/7c587d297fdad42fab7fa3055b76eea9  
  
''A corrupt government is a much bigger problem.''  
  
Yes, and they are always looking for ways to increase their power, by playing the 'Knight in shining armor' to protect the 'vulnerable', and people who should know better always fell for it.   A nation exists to promote OTNI, not individual right, certainly not some 'animal rights'.  
  
https://soj.ooo/p/freethinkers/post/0687c709bb72372a61d9d4bae0f83ab4

7 bumps

sonatime · 7/21/2026, 3:00:22 AM · permalink

5 bumps

H

hyokkim · 7/21/2026, 5:04:25 AM · permalink

And here's where I both agree and disagree with the Nazis.    Eugenics is valid, but what Nazis believed was not Eugenics, but pseudo-Eugenics.  
  
Breeding animals/people for certain characteristic does work, and breeding for certain characteristics for behavioral pattern would result in certain physical characteristics.   
  
However, breeding for certain physical characteristics will not necessarily result in desired behavioral patterns.  
  
https://soj.ooo/p/freethinkers/post/38602d6d47fce0973ab1c78f14356c72  
  
I've done enough research on dogs, especially, those nasty pitbulls.   One often hears a dog is aggressive because the dog was abused.  
  
What I have found out is that in documented cases of dogs mauling their kind owners, many times fatally, the dog was never abused.   Many times, these dogs were raised by their owners from puppyhood with love and care.   Never abused.  
  
Then, documented cases of dogs being abused by their owners (owners ended up going to prison), not once these abusive owners were mauled.    These abused dogs were never aggressive, but very passive, timid, but sometimes, still friendly even.   
  
So, the notion dog being abused is responsible for aggression is demonstrably false, and that's how I ended up being banned from yt.    Too many doggie crazies could not dispute my theory, but didn't want to hear the truth, so petitioned yt to ban me.  
  
Dog is aggressive because of genetics, not abuse, this genetic is passed down from nasty doggy parents to nasty puppies.     
  
Another conclusion I reached is that till 80s, there had not been many cases of aggressive dogs mauling people, especially their owners when people in general were more abusive to dogs than todays.   This explosion of pitbull mauling people really started in 80s, not before.  
  
Back till at least 30s, people aggressive pitbulls were often curled when they were puppies.  No epidemic of pitbull mauling people back then.   When doggie crazies took over starting from 70s, and nasty pitbulls were not curled, but instead blamed on poor training, and abuse, the epidemic of pitbulls mauling people started in earnest, starting in 80s.  
  
The same in ROK; aggressive dogs were often curled, 'baseball bat to the head' when they were puppies till 70s.   Very few cases of nasty dogs attacking people.   Now, dogs mauling people/owners are as common as in U.S.    With doggie crazies taking over the how the dogs should be raised, and not abused, with aggressive dogs never being curled like before.

3 bumps

sonatime · 7/21/2026, 6:20:31 AM · permalink

1 bump

Comments

Signature