Comment on Request for Comments (RFC) - soj.ooO Whitepaper by logical on 2/2/2026 (111335) - sojooo

Parent Post: Request for Comments (RFC) - soj.ooO Whitepaper

logical · 2/2/2026, 9:30:00 PM · permalink

Suggestions for 6.1 &amp; 6.2:  
*"*
*6.1 Weekly Rewards Model*

*The community allocation (24% of supply; 2,400,000 $SOJOOO) is distributed through weekly*

*rewards to content creators. This mechanism addresses the value extraction characteristic of*

*traditional platforms, where user labor generates surplus captured entirely by the proprietary*

*class (Srnicek, 2017; Marx, 1867). Under the soj.ooO model, value flows back to those who*

*create it.*

*Each week, the 25 highest-scoring posts receive token rewards, distributed automatically*

*upon period close. Distribution continues until the community allocation is exhausted. The*

*DAO retains authority to modify these parameters through standard governance procedures.*

*6.2 Engagement Score*

*Posts are ranked by a weighted engagement score:*

*S = 5C + 2R + B (1)*

*where C denotes comments, R reactions, and B bumps. The initial weights are:*

*Engagement Type Weight Rationale*

*Comments (w1) 5 Substantive engagement*

*Reactions (w2) 2 Active acknowledgment*

*Bumps (w3) 1 Visibility signal*
*"*

Change distribution from weekly to monthly.  To promote long term vision and balance and less gaming of the system in short terms.  This also gives a wider angle of what is popular right now while the site grows, and gives posts the necessary time to catch on.  
  
Add weighting systems for posts and comments that get bumps and replies from Multiple accounts, vrs posts and comments that get replies from lower number of accounts.  
  
Such as flame wars where 1 post gets 1000 comments but only from 2-3 accounts  
vrs a post that gets 100 comments but from 50 different accounts.  
  
More weight should be on the more users that interact with posts not just how many reactions it gets.  I think this can help isolate the "Flamewar" issue and still give priority to things that are popular but maybe doesn't generate endless discussion.

82 bumps

husky1 · 2/11/2026, 1:37:16 AM · permalink

4 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 2/3/2026, 8:04:44 AM · permalink

37 bumps

logical · 2/3/2026, 4:18:28 PM · permalink

24 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 2/3/2026, 4:25:03 PM · permalink

20 bumps

logical · 2/3/2026, 4:33:52 PM · permalink

18 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 2/3/2026, 4:39:36 PM · permalink

14 bumps

logical · 2/3/2026, 5:07:41 PM · permalink

13 bumps

tekzer0 · 2/19/2026, 11:53:29 PM · permalink

3 bumps

braven · 3/15/2026, 8:54:18 PM · permalink

Hey Logical,  
I would just like to make a point here that might help us see each other through a more friendly lens....something like that.   
  
I am taking this out of context....admittedly....so that we can isolate a pattern of contention that  has arisen needlessly between you and I.  Despite all the other disputes and personal interferences....just this point of technicality ...on Technology vs English Grammar  
  
*Either you do not understand technology*
  
This....and maybe....only this.  
We don't need to extrapolate away from this absolutely vital point of focus....tech!  
On a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being not well versed....most users here are less than 50 at best...flattering many including myself.  
When it comes to 'tech' Andrew Lee may be 99...100.  Could be...I do not have the acquired inputs to make that kind of conclusive output.  To use Andrew Lee's own terminology.  
I hope this makes sense....obvious stuff I think...no contention here...just stating the obvious.  
  
However....and this is kind of important, that 'tech' mastery does not apply to communicating with others in the written English Language.  This is where I come in...and not easily discounted as you may have been thinking.  
   
Words matter....code matters.  
  
And here we are.  Andrew Lee may know his stuff....and that would be amazing.  
That is why we are all here....literally.  To see.  
But lately...the 'messaging' has not been so good....and I was trying to help.  
I wonder if you can see that now?  How accurate I have been....since the beginning.  
You don't remember...from the beginning...I am the same guy.  
We all have our skills and we are wise not to conflate them into patterns of universal recognition....stay in our own lanes.  That is where we shine...and maybe only there.  ...something like that.  
Trying to help...still trying to help.  
  
Peace.😇

2 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 2/3/2026, 5:27:03 PM · permalink

4 bumps

logical · 2/3/2026, 5:33:21 PM · permalink

3 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 2/3/2026, 8:12:46 AM · permalink

10 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 2/2/2026, 9:36:11 PM · permalink

37 bumps

logical · 2/2/2026, 9:38:50 PM · permalink

33 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 2/2/2026, 9:41:13 PM · permalink

30 bumps

logical · 2/2/2026, 9:46:29 PM · permalink

26 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 2/2/2026, 9:48:52 PM · permalink

22 bumps

logical · 2/2/2026, 9:58:23 PM · permalink

18 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 2/2/2026, 10:30:53 PM · permalink

11 bumps

logical · 2/2/2026, 11:02:27 PM · permalink

7 bumps

Signature