soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
neo
·
p/offensive
·
8/14/2026, 11:42:17 PM
welp this "debate" was a joke
36
bumps
13
comments
Share
Comments
Log in to join the conversation
Log in
or
Sign up
hunter
·
8/15/2026, 3:26:21 AM
·
permalink
Stop being a consumer
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
neo
·
8/15/2026, 3:49:18 AM
·
permalink
aren't you the retarded kid that is afraid of bugs and bitcoin?
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
hunter
·
9/25/2026, 5:51:52 PM
(edited)
·
permalink
If you want to paint me as a retard, don't use retardation to do it. Let me rephrase that, for the simple mind: **your comment is absolute retardation.**
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
neo
·
9/27/2026, 1:59:24 AM
·
permalink
fair enough
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
babyvaso
·
8/15/2026, 2:58:31 AM
·
permalink
This debate was very bad, I had already blew it off when it was first announced as I've watched enough of Andrew on The Crucible to know exactly how he was going to debate. "Where's the evidence? That's not evidence! Where's the evidence? That's not evidence!" Over and over again to keep his opinion stuck in defense mode and for the first hour, I was listening at work I was quickly growing increasingly frustrated and decided to hop streams. When I was feeling the aura of the watch parties I saw exactly what I was expecting to see. Content creators that focus more on culture war issues barring serious political topics were overwhelming on Andrew's side. And people who do serious political analysis exclusively were overwhelmingly on Candace's side. The people I saw on Candace Side Nisscee.Social Dr Karlyn borysenko The Saint Liberty Lockdown The people I saw on Andrew's Side The Quartering TheWhateverPodcast Clinton Jaws Tim Pool This is why I've long since stopped watching Blood Sports. It is entertainment purposes only, a clash of egos.
Save
Cancel
9
bumps
Share
neo
·
8/15/2026, 3:50:20 AM
·
permalink
This is good analysis, both are grifters and it was a grifter low IQ war of retardedness.
Save
Cancel
7
bumps
Share
babyvaso
·
8/15/2026, 4:32:09 AM
·
permalink
I wouldn't call Candace a grifter, I am convinced debates serve zero purpose outside being entertainment.
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
neo
·
8/18/2026, 3:20:19 AM
·
permalink
these day's thats largely true. Since people just want to be right, not find the truth.
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
babyvaso
·
8/18/2026, 3:32:30 AM
·
permalink
I've largely left American media, independent and mainstream. The few channels I do follow that are "Independent" are conspiracist (right wing) and left wing Socialist/Marxist. You can hate the conspiracist on the far right, or the Marxist Leninist but they are vital because they will put fourth the strongest arguments for their positions while most are struggling to stay within the Algorithms good graces. My favorite right wing is "Really Graceful" My favorite left wing is "MidWesternMarx"
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
neo
·
8/18/2026, 6:03:32 AM
·
permalink
I think what were talking about here is more of an effect of the confusion of words, rather than an attack on 'debate' The problem much like many other words, the term "Debate" has become synonymous with "Reality TV show spectacle of argument" and not what the literal term means. This is a common tactic whereas lots of words have lost their meaning in the last decade or so. "Woman" "Racist" "Nazi" "Sexist" "Feminism" "Rape" I mean the list is endless, words simply have no meanings in many contexts now based on liberal ideology. Words have lost this context. "Debate" has become something where it's an event based on 2 influential talking heads smearing each other and avoiding factual information. debate /dĭ-bāt′/ intransitive verb To consider something; deliberate. To engage in argument by discussing opposing points. To engage in a formal discussion or argument. synonym: discuss. (Obsolete) To fight or quarrel. To deliberate on; consider. To dispute or argue about. To discuss or argue (a question, for example) formally. For centuries in western culture we had honest "Debates" in many contexts to determine outcomes scientifically or politically etc. Now it is a Reality TV Show style spectacle that segments people onto 1 side or the other to continue the 2 party system. Everything is politicized and there is no area left for "Debate".
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
wfgopack
·
8/15/2026, 12:07:41 AM
·
permalink
Still have an hour left. Not that bad so far. Entertaining.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
neo
·
8/15/2026, 3:51:07 AM
·
permalink
entertaining surely, what did we actually learn in the end? All 3 of these people are stupid and outside of reality.
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
neo
·
8/14/2026, 11:42:50 PM
·
permalink

Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close