soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Proportional representative system.........
·
In Reply To
H
hyokkim
·
5/28/2025, 7:50:18 PM
·
permalink
''I disagree. Corrupt politicians can't secretly communicate under live stream.'' - you ''Dude, corrupt politician can easily bypass the live stream to communicate with one another; how old are you? How many jobs have you had? Have you ever been in the militsry/LE/Security?'' - me in response So you don't deny the corrupt politicians can easily bypass the live stream to communicate with one another? ''And even so, if they happen to achieve secret communications. If they start taking positions you disagree with, you move your voting token to his opposition.'' - you ''What if the opposition is either the same or worse?'' - me in response No answer from you. ''Who spends time right now in the current system? You seem to be aware of what's going on, you seem to be conscious. Also, you don't look like an unemployed parasite.'' - you ''...but if I were an unemployed parasite, I would have even more time/energy than I have now!'' - me in response Again, no response from you; you don't deny I would have far more time/energy/power to influence the politicians as an economic parasite than as a full time working joe? ''Now I realize that you haven't read the proposed system at all. Or you misunderstood. The system is the following: You vote during an election and those who get elected will have a seat for the entire mandate. The government stays stable. But. When they vote for a bill, they vote with the weight of the tokens they have in hand. That means that if a million voters voted for them, their vote weights a million armed citizens. If the representative you gave your token to disappoints you, you take back your token (by the encrypted mechanisms I described in previously posted pochas) and reassign your token to some other representative that you better like.'' - you Dude, you are contradicting yourself: You had said: ''I guess that if you could control your vote after the election, you may sometimes change who represents you. One day you give power to Trump for an issue, next day you switch your token to Massie, next day to AOC if you want. You decide who represents you and you give them your token.'' - you ''Why are you interested in my personal life? It's irrelevant with the exchange of ideas we currently have. Judge the idea, not the bearer.'' Because you contradict your statement, and you betray a great deal of naivete in how the world really works in the areas you claim to know; you clearly do not.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
modernizedemocracy
·
5/28/2025, 7:57:43 PM
·
permalink
Neither do you. At this point you only look like an angry guy who just want to argue on the internet. The only contradiction is in how you understood various different ways I am trying to explain to you the very same thing. I have not changed the idea I propose and it's still clear and intact in my previous pochas. Gotta work. Later.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
H
hyokkim
·
5/28/2025, 8:05:52 PM
·
permalink
''Neither do you. At this point you only look like an angry guy who just want to argue on the internet. The only contradiction is in how you understood various different ways I am trying to explain to you the very same thing. I have not changed the idea I propose and it's still clear and intact in my previous pochas.'' - you Dude, this is what you had said: ''Now I realize that you haven't read the proposed system at all. Or you misunderstood. The system is the following: You vote during an election and those who get elected will have a seat for the entire mandate. The government stays stable. But. When they vote for a bill, they vote with the weight of the tokens they have in hand. That means that if a million voters voted for them, their vote weights a million armed citizens. If the representative you gave your token to disappoints you, you take back your token (by the encrypted mechanisms I described in previously posted pochas) and reassign your token to some other representative that you better like.'' - you ''Dude, you are contradicting yourself: You had said:'' - me in response ''I guess that if you could control your vote after the election, you may sometimes change who represents you. One day you give power to Trump for an issue, next day you switch your token to Massie, next day to AOC if you want. You decide who represents you and you give them your token.'' - you ''I disagree. Corrupt politicians can't secretly communicate under live stream.'' - you ''Dude, corrupt politician can easily bypass the live stream to communicate with one another; how old are you? How many jobs have you had? Have you ever been in the militsry/LE/Security?'' - me in response ''So you don't deny the corrupt politicians can easily bypass the live stream to communicate with one another?'' - me afterward in response ''And even so, if they happen to achieve secret communications. If they start taking positions you disagree with, you move your voting token to his opposition.'' - you ''What if the opposition is either the same or worse?'' - me in response ''No answer from you.'' - me afterward in response ''Who spends time right now in the current system? You seem to be aware of what's going on, you seem to be conscious. Also, you don't look like an unemployed parasite.'' - you ''...but if I were an unemployed parasite, I would have even more time/energy than I have now!'' - me in response ''Again, no response from you; you don't deny I would have far more time/energy/power to influence the politicians as an economic parasite than as a full time working joe?'' - me afterward in response
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
