Comment on Starting a War with Iran Just to Change the Epstein Channel by sonatime

Parent Post: Starting a War with Iran Just to Change the Epstein Channel · In Reply To

sonatime · 2/28/2026, 12:41:25 AM · permalink

Listen and understand.  
The pro-troll is out there.  
It can't be bargained with.  
It can't be reasoned with.  
It doesn't feel pity, remorse, or shame.  
And it absolutely will not stop… ever… until it has wasted your time:)  
  
Now, to the substance, since substance is apparently optional for you:)  
  
You reduce treason/espionage cases against Russian scientists to “they shared open-source info at international events and Putin got mad.” That's not what the charges are.  
  
The FSB cases (post-2022 especially) involve accusations of passing classified military-technical information — not open-source conference papers.  
Examples include:Anatoly Maslov &amp; Alexander Shiplyuk (Novosibirsk hypersonics lab) — charged with treason for allegedly transferring classified hypersonic research data.  
Dmitry Kolker (laser physicist) — arrested for “high treason” tied to foreign contacts (died shortly after in custody).  
Multiple others in the “Novosibirsk physicists” cluster.  
  
These are not “trumped-up charges because Putin couldn't take responsibility.” They fit a clear pattern: post-Ukraine invasion, Russia has dramatically increased treason/espionage prosecutions against scientists, academics, and even journalists with any Western ties. Levada and independent reporting (Meduza, The Insider) document this surge.  
  
On the “un-beatable hypersonic missile intercepted by 1980s tech” claim:  
  
You're likely referring to the Kinzhal (Kh-47M2) shoot-downs claimed by Ukraine (using Patriot PAC-3). Russia denies those were real Kinzhals or says they were decoys. Independent verification is unclear either way — no smoking-gun wreckage photos or telemetry released publicly.  
Oreshnik (the new IRBM-class hypersonic system Putin showcased in late 2024) is a different platform. Russian claims put it at Mach 10–11, but no confirmed combat use yet. Its “probable weakness” (inability to maneuver mid-course) is speculation — official descriptions say it has maneuvering warheads (MaRV-like), though unproven in real intercepts.  
  
You keep boiling complex, documented security cases down to cartoonish “Putin mad → jail scientists lol.” That's not argument; that's sensational ignorance dressed as skepticism. If you have actual counter-sources (not just “trust me bro” takes), show them.

23 bumps

sacredcow · 2/28/2026, 12:43:15 AM · permalink

20 bumps

sonatime · 2/28/2026, 1:00:11 AM · permalink

17 bumps

sacredcow · 2/28/2026, 1:06:23 AM · permalink

13 bumps

sonatime · 2/28/2026, 1:28:36 AM · permalink

11 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 2/28/2026, 3:10:26 PM · permalink

2 bumps

sacredcow · 2/28/2026, 12:36:34 PM · permalink

5 bumps

sonatime · 2/28/2026, 7:46:58 PM · permalink

3 bumps

Signature