soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Do children need more vaccines? RFK thinks so...
·
In Reply To
I
itrustnoone
·
3/4/2025, 6:40:44 AM
·
permalink
The measles vax is now a live virus. Live viruses shed and can infect immune compromised people as well as the unvaccinated. So those people are not given a choice but to be infected. All you have to do is google the package insert for the MMR and read it yourself. It will say that you shouldn't be around immune compromised people for 6 weeks I believe. I remember this from vaxxing my youngest and my dad is on immune suppressants from RA. If I could go back in time, I'd not do any vaccines. What people don't think about is that real "anti vaxxers" are mostly "ex vaxxers". They got their kids vaccinated, experienced side effects, many of which were irreversible, and decided to never do that again. We are eyewitnesses. We aren't kooks that haven't researched. We saw it first hand, did very deep research (far more than reading a newspaper article spouting propaganda), and made our informed choice for the future. Other people get told by their doctors that a shot mandated for school is on the schedule for their kids, they just say, "ok", then accuse anti vaxxers of being the uninformed ones. Who is really uninformed? For the record, I'd rather my kids have measles than autism (one of mine has it, another has sensory integration dysfunction, which is another side effect that was not even heard of until the 90's). The reason people think there are hardly any side effects is because our we are silenced, our children are ignored. Doctors do not report vaccine injuries and the CDC doesn't really want them to. You aren't allowed to sue pharma companies, you can only sue the government. This takes many years if they will even allow your case to go before their special vaccine court, the government has unlimited money and resources to fight you, therefore, no one knows these injuries are even happening. Also, vaccines are NOT effective most of the time. The MMR has been found ineffective after 5 years. Have you gotten a booster in the past 5 years? If not, unprotected. Shingles vax, known side effect is getting shingles. I kid you not. My dad was told to get shingles shot since he is immune compromised. Got shingles shortly after. Flu shot is rarely more than 20% effective if that. Sometimes they tell you it's much higher, but it's a slight of hand in the way they phrase the term "effective". A Cochrane review looked at the effects of the influenza vaccine in healthy adults from 25 studies conducted over single influenza seasons in North America, South America, and Europe between 1969 and 2009. It found the vaccine reduced the chance of getting laboratory confirmed influenza from 23 cases out of 1,000 to 9 cases out of 1,000. While this seems to be a reduction of more than 50%, that seems less optimistic expressed in absolute terms. The infection rate in adults drops from 2% per year to 1%. You could say that’s halved, but it effectively only drops by 1%. So this means that out of every 100 healthy adults vaccinated, 99 get no benefit against laboratory confirmed influenza. You see how the health departments make it seem like the vaccine works most of the time, but it really benefits almost no one? That's just one short little argument. There are plenty more. That's why RFK doing an about face on everything he has said previously (for the record, he has always said the risks of the measles vax are worse than the disease) IS a big deal. I have a HUGE problem with it because children are injured every day due to those damn vaccines, and parents have no idea of the risks because they are being lied to. And RFK has just perpetuated that lie himself.
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
W
witness
·
3/4/2025, 8:29:43 AM
·
permalink
Yes, so in theory (conventional first principles) vaccinating against measles *should* be more effective. The more inert the vaccine the more reliance on adjuvant. The trade off is the higher risk of causing an actual infection - as you point out. Despite this you conclude it's actually not effective at preventing measles? Ok I agree insofar as I think that's entirely possible given the scope of subterfuge pharma engages in regularly. But the only thing I would add is that we've had decades of profiteering science polluting the industry and moreover public opinion. I don't think it's wise to swap one brand of health dictators for another, even if we think we're right - it's more important to clean up the science up otherwise we're never going to know anything. We can't just tell people they've been lied to, we have to show them. The fluoride narrative that has pervaded normy science culture is crumbling as we speak. That's huge, I think so long as the science remains open and honest under RFKs era of HHS we will get the answers. I get where you're coming from, if this is a sign the man has been captured then science is fucked again for who knows how long but I'm still optimistic, the culture irrespective of RFK is moving in the right direction. Whether or not he can, or will bring the establishment remains to be seen, but I'm not ready to call it yet on that one.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close