Comment on When does a woman become a dumb bitch? by braven

Parent Post: When does a woman become a dumb bitch? · In Reply To

braven · 7/10/2025, 5:33:28 PM · permalink

106 bumps

hyokkim · 7/10/2025, 5:53:20 PM · permalink

''That being said, not sure the language you use is appropriate for the message you are sharing.

Or....maybe it is exactly appropriate, but I will let others give their responses.''  
  
Yes, I've heard that, almost got into a shouting match with a few dumbfucks, who thought I could not use such language on one's own mother: A real man can if she's a dumb bitch.  
  
''As for Tate....he is giving the worst advice....hard to believe anyone would take advice from him...and yet...here we are.

Tate is aware that others have been 'hurt' and he is monetizing that....little more.

That you take advice from him....to me....seems like you would have figured this out on your own, or already did, and Tate was just an angry troll getting its chance to vocalize angst against a horrible childhood experience....please feel free to disregard this overly simplified synopsis...just mentioning this as the pattern seems recognizable among many others as well.''  
  
On this, I disagree, and based on firsthand experience no less; my father had been a business executive, and many times earlier, he had constantly on the go, coming home on regular basis, once a while.      I missed that dad, coming home, once a while, carrying gifts, and sharing stories.  
  
Later on, he had gotten ill, both diabetes and liver problem, business had failed.   So he stayed home all the time, and trying to be a 'father' to me full time; I really resented it.  I liked it better when he was a part time dad.     
  
''That you take advice from him....to me....seems like you would have figured this out on your own, or already did, and Tate was just an angry troll getting its chance to vocalize angst against a horrible childhood experience....please feel free to disregard this overly simplified synopsis...just mentioning this as the pattern seems recognizable among many others as well.

Tate is not a rebel....he is a troll.''  
  
That is the popular perception of him by people who have not even heard what he had to say for real; I used to think like that as well, and one day I decided to listen what he really had to say, and the solution he offered, and it opened my eyes.  
  
He said, in public, you do not want a dude who cannot say, no to his wife/gf, in the matters of profound importance, not some petty, pedantic stuff, affecting both of them, in your team.   He is the only person who said this in public, no less, and I do know firsthand, secondhand, thirdhand, how true that is.  
  
A dude that like that will betray you and your team, sooner or later.  
  
He also said, you do not want a dude who does not have the money, looks, but desires 5 star woman.   A dude like that would be a piece of cake to seduce/blackmail, compromise, or 'turn'.   You do not want such a dude in your team; again, how true that is.  
  
I know a lot of people who criticize Tate, but when the government implodes, with bad dudes running around, to rape/rob/murder, would you feel safer with a dude like Tate around, or without him?  
  
I would feel safer with him around, than with those who criticize Tate.

99 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/10/2025, 6:17:19 PM · permalink

97 bumps

hyokkim · 7/10/2025, 7:10:05 PM · permalink

''Your sycophantic hero worship highlights a complete and utter lack of masculinity in you....''  
  
Hey, at least I am not gay, much less a faggot, but I might become a buttfucker if I were deprived of women for a long time, and Nick Fuentes showed up sauntering around.  
  
Nice to meetcha, Nick, come here often?  
  
Have you studied Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great's campaigns?  
  
Or the Iron Pagoda cavalry of the Jurchen Jin dynasty?  
  
''All the female prisoners were ordered, on pain of death, to serve the Jin aristocrats no matter what rank in society they had previously held.  
  
("Because the maiden martyrs Mistress Zhang and Mistress Cao resisted the Second Prince's ambitions, they were impaled with metal rods and placed in front of a tent where they bled to death in three days. On the 7th day of the month, the other concubines entered the stockade. The prince used the example of Zhang and Cao as a warning, and they all begged for their lives.)  
  
A Jin prince wanted to marry Emperor Huizong's daughter, Zhao Fujin, who had been another man's wife. Later on, the emperor's concubines were also given to the prince by Emperor Taizong.  
  
 (An angry Wanyan Zonghan said: "Yesterday I was ordered to separate the prisoners, how can you refuse to obey? Our men shall each take two women." Emperor Huizong replied, "Above there is Heaven, and below emperors and the people have their daughters and daughters-in-law." His protest proved ineffective. Sheyema married Zhao Fujin during his journey back north. After Sheyema arrived in the Supreme Capital, the Jin Emperor Taizong delivered the following edict: "The Imperial Princess Zhao Fujin, along with Concubines Xu Shengying, Yang Diao'er and Chen Wenwan  
  
 To avoid captivity and slavery under the Jurchens, many palace women committed suicide.  
  
In retaliation for Jurchen women being raped by Khitan men, Khitan women prisoners were given as wives to the Han Chinese Song princes when they were both taken into captivity by the Jurchen.\[22\] The Song male Han Chinese princes who were captured were given Khitan women to marry from the Liao dynasty palace by the Jin Jurchens, who had also defeated and conquered the Khitan of the Liao dynasty in Mongolia. The original Chinese wives of the Song princes were confiscated and replaced with Khitan ones. One of the Song Emperor Huizong's sons was given a Khitan consort from the Liao palace and another one of his sons was given a Khitan princess by the Jin at the Jin Supreme capital (Shangjing, now in Acheng District, Harbin, Heilongjiang province). The Jin Jurchens continued to give new wives to the captured Song royals, the grandsons and sons of Song Emperor Huizong after they took away their original Chinese wives.\[23\] The Jin Jurchens told the Han Chinese Song royals that they were fortunate because the Liao Khitan royals were being treated much worse by the Jurchen than the Song Chinese royals, Jurchen soldiers were given the children of the Liao Khitan Tianzuo Emperor as gifts while the Song Emperor was allowed to keep his children while he was in captivity.''  
  
Now, who were these Jurchen Jins who were so 'abusive' to women?  
  
https://dragonsarmory.blogspot.com/2018/04/iron-pagoda-iron-buddha-cavalryman.html  
  
Are you telling me they were not masculine?   Are you for real?   Are you letting the dumb bitches and soy boys decide what is masculine?  
  
'' So maybe give the Tate tard a miss and keep searching.''  
  
It really doesn't matter how you feel about it; western civilization is collapsing.  
  
''Spengler predicted that about the year 2000, Western civilization would enter the period of pre‑death emergency which would lead to 200 years of Caesarism (extra-constitutional omnipotence of the executive branch of government) before Western civilization's final collapse''  
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler

67 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/10/2025, 7:36:44 PM · permalink

62 bumps

hyokkim · 7/10/2025, 8:15:58 PM · permalink

49 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/10/2025, 8:38:45 PM · permalink

46 bumps

hyokkim · 7/11/2025, 12:43:25 AM · permalink

Dude, have an open mind, read some classics when the Western civilization was still growing; you will see a different definition of 'heroes'.  
  
''Homosexuality was declassified as a disease by the American Psychiatric Association in 1973.''  
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality#United_States  
  
That's the kind of society we are living in, that decides what is 'normal'.   And you are letting them decide what is normal.  
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_liberation_of_France  
  
Machiavelli closes by stating that since "fortune is changeable" while rulers are firmly set in their ways, princes will prosper "so long as fortune and policy are in accord." Machiavelli asserts his belief, though, that it is "better to be impetuous than circumspect." He attributes this to the fact that "fortune is a woman and if she is to be submissive it is necessary to beat and coerce her." Continuing the metaphor, Machiavelli says of fortune, "Always, being a woman, she favors young men, because they are less circumspect and more ardent, and because they command her with greater audacity."  
  
While Machiavelli concedes that rulers may succeed with a variety of different virtuous and unvirtuous methods, he recommends rashness over cautiousness. Describing fortune as a woman, Machiavelli urges rulers "to beat and coerce her," compelling her to remain in their favor. It is worth noting that Machiavelli's metaphor here hints at the second-class status of many Renaissance women, who were often regarded as property.''  
  
Like I had said, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and Stalin were not little ass twats, whatever you think they were.   They had no problem being abusive to women when there was 'good enough' reason, for them.   I am not saying I agree with them.  I am saying whether a man is considered great or not is not based on whether he is nice to women or not, but what he manages to accomplish, in the end, and if abusing women is a part of the package, then it is what it is.  
  
This notion of real men do not abuse women is a modern invention by the dumb bitches, and the soy boys; that has never been the case as a rule in history.  
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_the_Sabine_women

44 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 12:53:37 AM · permalink

39 bumps

hyokkim · 7/11/2025, 2:50:35 AM · permalink

No, I have had sex only with prostitutes.  Now, I could have had sex with non-prostitutes many times in my life, none of them initiated by me, but by the girls themselves.  Some of them, beautiful girls, some others ok, and some others, they would have had to pay me a million bucks for me to even consider.  
  
Believe it or not, some of these prostitutes were beautiful, almost model level, working on the street!   
  
One girl, blonde, blue eyes, from Montana, very nice, friendly, about 6ft, model thin, in her 20s, working with 2 other girls without a pimp, traveling throughout Midwest.    No pimp.  
  
Another girl, also blonde, blue eyes, from Santa Monica, CA, working with another Chicana girl, no pimp.    5ft 6in, 25y, at the time.  Friendly, but business like.    
  
Another girl, blo/blu, 21y, from IA, very friendly.   Had a 'boyfriend', but not scary looking.  
  
I have been accused of sexual harassment, about 4 times in my life, most of them, real hippos, 300lbs, 5ft 6in dumb bitches who wanted a piece of my eggroll.  I declined, but they couldn't take no means no.   So much for equality!   So they had to make me 'pay' for the rebuff.    I got cleared by the management in all cases.   They all knew I was a straight shooter, telling it like it is, even when it makes me look bad, even when I had to take a testimony in favor of some scumbags at work they knew I did not like.  
  
I traveled to FL a number of times to have sex with fantasy women, 5 star pornstar look alike.   Unlike Omaha, S.FL, was very tolerant of escorts.    I ended up hooking with one milf, 5ft 11in, 43y, blo/blu, knock out body, porn star level enthusiasm.   Another, 5ft 10in, 25y athletic build, brown hair/blue eyes, from Latvia, real friendly.  
  
I also traveled to LAX to meet a girl, 30y, 6ft 1in blo/blu from Lithuania, athletic build, professional masseur as well, with happy ending.   Real nice as well, she even propositioned me to take her as my mistress, 'kept woman', when she thought that I was some kind of traveling businessman, with some money.  
  
I have been to a number of dating sites, and I've found dozens and dozens of beautiful women, wanting to marry me, or to become my 'kept woman'; they know what I look like, and what I am working on.   None of them dumb bitches; I screen them out from the getgo.  
  
One reason why I like porn is my libido is a limited resource, especially as I am getting older.  I don't want to waste it on women who is not 5 star.   I see so many dudes wasting their libido on women that I would rate only 2 star, also time/money as well.   By getting used to 5 star women, I become more selective who I want to stick my eggroll into their dipping bowl, with.  
  
Well, a 2 star woman demanding a man who is at least 2 star and above to spend so much time/money on her is a dumb bitch; man complying is a dumb fuck.   I learned to stay away from both.     
  
There are so many good looking women who are not dumb bitches; why would I waste my time/resources in complying with dumb bitch/soy boy demands?  
  
If the dumb bitches, and soy boys get raped and beaten to death, by MS-13, VZ/TDA gangbangers, why the fuck should I care?  
  
  I have the right to decide for whom I would risk my life for; I don't have to let the dumb bitches/soy boys decide for whom I should risk my life for, just because they come with a dipping bowl, or willing to open the backdoor for another backdoor body to stick it in, or come with a circumcised dick.  
  
A great man is decided by what he manages to accomplish in his life, ideally, with as little tragedy as possible.   Not by how nice he is to women, and dumb animals.   The modern definition of 'hero' has been corrupted by the dumb bitches/soy boys.   U.S. could not have come into being without the mass murder/robberies, and rapes, too by some of the Founding fathers' generation, and their descendants.  
  
U.S. has been defined by the accomplishments, the great accomplishments, no less, not by how nice U.S. has been to women, and dumb animals, and gays.  
  
Now, U.S. wants to be defined by how nice U.S. is to women, gays, dumb animals!  
  
Here, I gotta give to the real Americans, back in the day, for their forthrightness.  
  
  
''During the period of the 1890 Ghost Dance movement and Wounded Knee Massacre, Baum wrote two editorials asserting that the safety of American settlers depended on the wholesale genocide of Native Americans. These editorials were re-published in 1990 by sociologist Robert Venables of Cornell University, who argues that Baum was not using sarcasm.\[42\] Historian Camilla Townsend, the editor of American Indian History: A Documentary Reader, argued that the editorial was "Against character", as he had earlier published a piece that criticized the idea of White Americans fearing Native Americans; Townsend stated that she failed to find evidence that Baum was using sarcasm.\[43\]

The first piece was published on December 20, 1890, five days after the killing of the Lakota Sioux holy man Sitting Bull.\[44\]\[45\] The piece opined that with Sitting Bull's death, "the nobility of the Redskin" had been extinguished, and the safety of the frontier would not be established until there was "total annihilation" of the remaining Native Americans, who, he claimed, lived as "miserable wretches." Baum said that their extermination should not be regretted, and their elimination would "do justice to the manly characteristics" of their ancestors.\[44\]

The Wounded Knee Massacre occurred nine days later; the second editorial was published on January 3, 1891. Baum alleged that General Nelson A. Miles' weak rule on the Native Americans had caused American soldiers to suffer a "terrible loss of blood", in a "battle" which had been a disgrace to the Department of War. He found that the "disaster" could have easily been prevented with proper preparations. Baum reiterated that he believed, due to the history of mistreatment of Native Americans, that the extermination of the "untamed and untamable" tribes was necessary to protect American settlers. Baum ended the editorial with the following anecdote: "An eastern contemporary, with a grain of wisdom in its wit, says that 'when the whites win a fight, it is a victory, and when the Indians win it, it is a massacre.' ''  
  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Frank_Baum#Baum's_beliefs

37 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 9:13:32 AM · permalink

35 bumps

sacredcow · 7/11/2025, 2:30:53 PM · permalink

5 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/20/2025, 3:08:04 PM · permalink

2 bumps

sacredcow · 7/11/2025, 2:26:27 PM · permalink

25 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 2:34:41 PM · permalink

22 bumps

sacredcow · 7/11/2025, 2:51:29 PM · permalink

11 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 8:41:33 PM · permalink

2 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 8:45:26 PM · permalink

6 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 8:45:48 PM · permalink

3 bumps

sacredcow · 7/11/2025, 3:03:36 PM · permalink

8 bumps

thoughtcriminal_1984 · 7/11/2025, 8:41:06 PM · permalink

5 bumps

Signature