Comment on WE WAS WAKANDA by saarnok

Parent Post: WE WAS WAKANDA · In Reply To

saarnok · 5/30/2026, 3:26:49 AM · permalink

When you attribute a quote to someone it needs to be a quote of that person.  
  
If it's not, it doesn't improve things that it's something you believe to be apt. You're borrowing credibility from someone else as though it's not sufficiently meaningful if it comes from you.  
  
And, you just basically need to educate yourself better about these subjects.  
  
Marx DID use the term communism in his "Communist Manifesto" in 1848, but it was already becoming popular in radical circles of the day. The concept however dates back to at least 375 BC with Plato's Republic, makes an appearance in Acts chapter 2 and 4, appears in "Utopia" in 1516, "City Of The Sun" in 1602, "The Diggers" in 1649.  
  
The active revolutionary aspect of the cult begins with Gracchus Babeuf who attempted to lead a "Conspiracy Of Equals" and assumed his name "Grachus" as a tribute the the Grachi brothers of ancient Rome who attempted land reform in the Roman republic and were slaughtered along with their supporters.  
  
Fittingly, he met the guillotine for his own efforts and the tone of "kill or be killed" was set in the nascent Communist movement which would be advanced by Marx.  
  
Of Jewish descent, his father converted to the Lutheran faith and of the scores of groups Marx hated, Jews were his first target, largely repeating the stereotypes associated with them at the time.  
  
Marx cared about Marx, first and foremost, and if disgust can be a lifeform certainly embodied that distinct expression of human character.  
  
"The Jews", were a population almost uniquely suited to be infected with Communism owing to their careful recording of historical slights (in their opinion) against them.  
  
This did not make them more susceptible to radicalism.  
  
The one almost unifying factor was that communist agitators were the children of the well off who had them educated, imbuing them with the absurd certainty they could run the world better than the people who actually did.  
  
Communism isn't a Jewish conspiracy. It's a conspiracy to which many Jews subscribe.  
  
What makes Jews problematic is their belief that they are owed the world, that every non-Jew is sub-human and that they are rightfully entitled to be our masters. And it doesn't matter how they get there.

7 bumps

paschn · 5/30/2026, 1:30:53 PM · permalink

In closing, you stated; "What makes Jews problematic is their belief that they are owed the world, that every non-Jew is sub-human and that they are rightfully entitled to be our masters. And it doesn't matter how they get there." I came to that conclusion days after MOSSAD's succesful false flag. All things in your comment prior to that were exposed almost immediately after the Rabbi's son's book was published. Most were/are aware of the facts even w/o your microscopic breakdown, just much more recently - as verified by their own boastings; (Rabbi Wise/Yagoda etc.). I never thought Communism was/is a (faux) Jew conspiracy - it's an INTEGRAL PART of the (faux) Jews' dogma, as is fooling the Goyim into thinking that democracy, as they use it, is a good thing. Nearly ALL FORMS OF GOVERNING are presented as "good for man". The problem isn't the IDEA - the PROBLEM is the EVIL and IMPERFECTIONS within the hearts of MEN. Which is the PRIMARY point of proving man CANNOT rule man. We NEED to return to THEOCRATIC RULE - Which, ironically, returns us to the initial LIE Satan sold when he disputed Jehovah's right to rule over His creations. The (faux) Jews' dogma has, over centuries, destroyed mankind's spirituality. Doing so was KEY to their takeover of same. Hence the Christ's labelling that dogma as a Synagogue of Satan immediately prior to their murdering him. Step back, (metaphorically), and after reading the quote attributed to Dostoevsky. Which is most important, whom it was who actually SPOKE the quote - or it's TRUTH in mankind's present situation? We all know the (faux) Jew has mangled history beyond recognition - Even the effort you show in searching for the origins of a word; (communsim), are subject to our owners' treachery. How the word is being used and what it represents NOW, TODAY, in our present chaos cannot be distorted by mankind's 2nd worst enemy, (after their "father, the Devil"). My statement;  Karl Marx's book/beliefs %%**may not have used**%% the title "communist" or "communism"... See? it wasn't definative, it was only a premise. What matters is how it's being used at - this - time. We shouldn't weigh ourselves down with minutia.  
![image](https://us-lax-1.linodeobjects.com/sojooo/comments/3558/1780147853319-dbb7e2b216fcbfc2.jpg)

Signature