soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
P
paschn
·
p/compromisedamerica
·
5/24/2026, 4:24:35 AM
WE WAS WAKANDA
25
bumps
8
comments
Share
Comments
Log in to join the conversation
Log in
or
Sign up
S
saarnok
·
5/25/2026, 4:28:56 AM
·
permalink
See, this is how "they" are using you to discredit your position. There was no such book. There was no Communist Party at the time the non-existent book was supposedly authored. The author in question did not write what was quoted and while a Zionist was (oddly) not a Communist. The actual author of that passage was Eustace Mullins who wrote it in a letter to the editor published by the Washington Star in April of 1957. When confronted Mullins claimed to have read it from a Zionist book in the Library of Congress, but no such book has ever been found. Mullins was known to be dishonest and this entire thing was debunked thoroughly by 1958. I'd really like to see you do a better job of what you're trying to do, rather than being used to effect the opposite of your intent. Unless your actual intent is to discredit people trying to expose the Jewish culture as the inveterate parasite it is. In which case, you're doing a great job.
Save
Cancel
11
bumps
Share
P
paschn
·
5/29/2026, 5:14:33 PM
·
permalink
Thank you(?) While I cannot fully accept your comment, (since ALL MEDIA is owned by the (faux) Jew), I appreciate all who take the time/effort to look into "things". There was another commentor who cared as much as you and repeatedly questioned various quotes. But after all is said and done, doesn't the VALIDITY of any quote matter more than whomever it was/is credited with stating it? For example, Twain was credited with stating (paraphrase); Diapers and politicians need to be changed often and for the same reason... With the (faux) Jews' incessant corruption of all things, did Twain say it? Hard to say - Is it applicable? Wouldn't you agree it is 100% applicable? - Voltair is credited with the following, (again, paraphrase); If you want to know who controls you, look for those you CANNOT criticize. Again, Did Voltair say it? Hard to say - Is it APPLICABLE? Wouldn't you agree it's 100% applicable? Several (faux) Jews have boasted about Communism being as integral to their plans as Democratic government is. Karl Marx's book/beliefs may not have used the title "communist" or "communism", but is it joined at the hip to the (faux) Jews' plans? I definately think so. Our owners may not have come up with the title communism, when their cohort wrote his treatise, but most now use the term; Marxist Communism. Also, our "marrano" president, FDR's handler - Rabbi Stephen Wise along with Yagoda boasted to the fact that Judaism IS Communism. It certainly worked for them in Russia while they controlled it as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, (U.S.S.R.) 
Save
Cancel
9
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
5/30/2026, 3:26:49 AM
·
permalink
When you attribute a quote to someone it needs to be a quote of that person. If it's not, it doesn't improve things that it's something you believe to be apt. You're borrowing credibility from someone else as though it's not sufficiently meaningful if it comes from you. And, you just basically need to educate yourself better about these subjects. Marx DID use the term communism in his "Communist Manifesto" in 1848, but it was already becoming popular in radical circles of the day. The concept however dates back to at least 375 BC with Plato's Republic, makes an appearance in Acts chapter 2 and 4, appears in "Utopia" in 1516, "City Of The Sun" in 1602, "The Diggers" in 1649. The active revolutionary aspect of the cult begins with Gracchus Babeuf who attempted to lead a "Conspiracy Of Equals" and assumed his name "Grachus" as a tribute the the Grachi brothers of ancient Rome who attempted land reform in the Roman republic and were slaughtered along with their supporters. Fittingly, he met the guillotine for his own efforts and the tone of "kill or be killed" was set in the nascent Communist movement which would be advanced by Marx. Of Jewish descent, his father converted to the Lutheran faith and of the scores of groups Marx hated, Jews were his first target, largely repeating the stereotypes associated with them at the time. Marx cared about Marx, first and foremost, and if disgust can be a lifeform certainly embodied that distinct expression of human character. "The Jews", were a population almost uniquely suited to be infected with Communism owing to their careful recording of historical slights (in their opinion) against them. This did not make them more susceptible to radicalism. The one almost unifying factor was that communist agitators were the children of the well off who had them educated, imbuing them with the absurd certainty they could run the world better than the people who actually did. Communism isn't a Jewish conspiracy. It's a conspiracy to which many Jews subscribe. What makes Jews problematic is their belief that they are owed the world, that every non-Jew is sub-human and that they are rightfully entitled to be our masters. And it doesn't matter how they get there.
Save
Cancel
7
bumps
Share
P
paschn
·
5/30/2026, 1:30:53 PM
·
permalink
In closing, you stated; "What makes Jews problematic is their belief that they are owed the world, that every non-Jew is sub-human and that they are rightfully entitled to be our masters. And it doesn't matter how they get there." I came to that conclusion days after MOSSAD's succesful false flag. All things in your comment prior to that were exposed almost immediately after the Rabbi's son's book was published. Most were/are aware of the facts even w/o your microscopic breakdown, just much more recently - as verified by their own boastings; (Rabbi Wise/Yagoda etc.). I never thought Communism was/is a (faux) Jew conspiracy - it's an INTEGRAL PART of the (faux) Jews' dogma, as is fooling the Goyim into thinking that democracy, as they use it, is a good thing. Nearly ALL FORMS OF GOVERNING are presented as "good for man". The problem isn't the IDEA - the PROBLEM is the EVIL and IMPERFECTIONS within the hearts of MEN. Which is the PRIMARY point of proving man CANNOT rule man. We NEED to return to THEOCRATIC RULE - Which, ironically, returns us to the initial LIE Satan sold when he disputed Jehovah's right to rule over His creations. The (faux) Jews' dogma has, over centuries, destroyed mankind's spirituality. Doing so was KEY to their takeover of same. Hence the Christ's labelling that dogma as a Synagogue of Satan immediately prior to their murdering him. Step back, (metaphorically), and after reading the quote attributed to Dostoevsky. Which is most important, whom it was who actually SPOKE the quote - or it's TRUTH in mankind's present situation? We all know the (faux) Jew has mangled history beyond recognition - Even the effort you show in searching for the origins of a word; (communsim), are subject to our owners' treachery. How the word is being used and what it represents NOW, TODAY, in our present chaos cannot be distorted by mankind's 2nd worst enemy, (after their "father, the Devil"). My statement; Karl Marx's book/beliefs %%**may not have used**%% the title "communist" or "communism"... See? it wasn't definative, it was only a premise. What matters is how it's being used at - this - time. We shouldn't weigh ourselves down with minutia. 
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
5/31/2026, 4:48:50 PM
·
permalink
You are coping. We've gone back and forth on this before and my impulse that you still act as though you don't get, is that I want you to do what you do better than you do it. If you're going to portray modern anti-Westernism as simply "Jewish", then just do a better job of it! I'm not all that invested in the idea of Jewish supremacy either as a pro or con position. I'm interested in people understanding that any "Good Jew" does in fact think that way. They also need to understand that it's far more a problem that non-Jews, and a hell of a lot of them believe in it. If I were in charge of promoting the idea of Jewish supremacy I would PAY for people to do what you do, so as to advance the idea that oponents of the idea would look ridiculous. "They" want you to do exactly what you're doing.
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
P
paschn
·
5/31/2026, 8:23:42 PM
·
permalink
If, as you say, you too want them exposed and I, in my 80 year old, half deaf, half blind digitally ignorant mind, is simply not believable or not up to the task, then why aren't you helping with the research and exposure of truth, rather than, like a juvenile penguin, bobbing about pecking at pebbles on a mostly barren shore? Why do you think I include links in comments the (faux) Jews haven't followed back and destroyed? Rather than tormenting/vilifying an old fart with one LEG in the grave, take up your post and JOIN IN! When they decide to activate H.R. res. 104, we'll be on the guillotine along with our (Christian/Muslim) families... And none of this will matter, will it? 
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
5/31/2026, 8:42:58 PM
·
permalink
Muslim? Really? If you think Islam is compatible with the West, you're gravely mistaken. You don't get that I've already stopped even reading your quotes? I actually don't know or care what you completed your response with because every time I check into what you present it's either utterly irrelevant or completely fake.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
P
paschn
·
6/2/2026, 2:38:58 AM
·
permalink
The only thing I think compatible between Christians/Muslims is our both being "used" and "abused" by the (faux) Jew. As for all else? Thank you for abandoning me. I know I'll breath as big a sigh of relief as you are. The only other point I still ponder pertaining to you? Does AIPAC/MOSSAD have direct deposit and a retirement plan. Peace.
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close