soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Joseon Cybernation Wikipedia page
·
In Reply To
siouxsie
·
3/29/2026, 6:59:12 PM
·
permalink
I’m actually curious about this because mark and Andrew had people adding false information to their wiki pages and other content, and then for some reason the pages got locked from further editing. so I’m curious to know if the same thing will happen here. misinformation is rampant and muddying the waters is easy to do when an agenda is at play. So hopefully you can show us that you’re not going to be that way. .
Save
Cancel
9
bumps
Share
carbon
·
3/29/2026, 8:29:53 PM
·
permalink
@siouxsie So I can provide some insight into this, there is a notable amount of people who go "SOURCES REGARDING CRYPTO SHOULDN'T BE USED IN BIOGRAPHIES" because it's blind hate. These people tend to break Wikipedia's rules by having series upon series of alt accounts. That's what makes things difficult, because after you lock the page, sure, no more bad edits can be made, but now someone has to go and try to pick out all the stuff these bad actors add, and this stuff is less subjective than you'd think. A lot of edits could be as small as citing some random website that nobody's ever heard of, or as big as adding entire paragraphs of information. Now in the case of Mark, I didn't realize how bad it was until you pointed it out, but sh\*t, I'm scrolling from the history of now back to as far as September of 2024, and like at least 85% of all edits were made by alt accounts. It seems a significant portion of these were also adding generally positive stuff, which is why it looks like things have made Mark look bad. It's not a unique thing I'd say, very reminiscent of the whole debate on Wikipedia about Battle for Dream Island, which is a show on Youtube. In the case of Andrew, there's a lot of people that consider his claim to royalty "dubious", which goes as far back as 2021 and only mostly resolved in 2025. This led to paragraphs being added and deleted on a weekly basis, leading to the page being locked, and many many attempts to try to resolve it. I personally have never really understood why this was a big issue.
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
siouxsie
·
3/29/2026, 8:35:29 PM
·
permalink
Funny how certain rhetorics can be pressed isn’t it. It’s obvious if you really look at it. Im merely here to point things out when I feel like it. 😅 There truly is an agenda at play. People need to start being honest around here.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
