soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: White Females Always Siding with Criminals - 1 vs 4 Under Anarcho-Tyranny
sacredcow
·
11/12/2026, 12:48:30 PM
·
permalink
@braven  I'm arguing with this slippery fucker on Youtube about Andrew Wilson's dumb ass opinions about morality. I have stated that the Non-aggression principle and Natural law should lead most of humans actions. How would you respond to this person? @sonatime
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
sonatime
·
11/12/2026, 1:45:51 PM
·
permalink
This is the problem when you are defending your views without at least adequately exchanging them:) if you let someone nitpick everything you say without needing to explain their own standards, it will become tedious. I don't know if this will be useful to you but this is where my mind goes needing sleep and reading your comment:) If you want a way to answer that comment without needing to appeal to a creator or religious text, look into Ethical Intuitionism. It is something that will bridge the Non-Aggression Principle and Natural Law. It explains how "gut feelings" we have about right and wrong aren't just random preferences, they are moral intuitions, moral truths perceived directly by human conscience. In philosophy, this is called using appearance as evidence: just like your eyes perceive physical reality, even though vision isn't 100% infallible, your conscience perceives moral reality. So if you apply that to the slavery question: a majority choosing slavery wouldn't make slavery moral; it would just mean a majority of people are acting against moral reality and suppressing their own basic empathy.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
sacredcow
·
11/12/2026, 2:10:03 PM
·
permalink
Yeah, this person dips, ducks and dodges the question in return. Thanks, I will respond with my own panache way of misunderstanding phrases to this fool
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
