soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: What I should have done long ago. sacredcow is blocked.
·
In Reply To
sonatime
·
10/8/2026, 4:38:34 AM
·
permalink
The YT clip is more confusing than cow's tactics. My read is not a diagnosis or spirit reading: she looks mentally ill, possibly off medication, and the demon story is how the crisis came out. The husband going along and bringing the guns makes less sense as support and more sense as his own motive with her crisis as cover. Past that I’m guessing, so I’m tapping out. I don’t know if this is relevant to yours and cow’s usual sparring.
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
10/8/2026, 6:09:26 PM
·
permalink
You aren't getting it at all. Here is his claim, which he's made in a few ways many, many times. https://soj.ooo/p/trolls/post/c1da55834919572ce8a1263dad4657c0/comment/147857 "Everything today is labeled as good and bad and then entities such as gods or devils are given responsibilities for the labels of good or bad, instead of the HUMANS doing the actions." Is this clear? He's saying that sentence is an accurate representation of what you and virtually everyone else believes. And according to him, that's the reason he's always tossing the word "human" into the mix all the time. Because he thinks you don't know that "humans" are responsible for their actions. And, I'm honestly torn if he is actually stupid enough to believe this video constitutes evidence that he's right. He's definitely smart enough to realize that he has to pretend that he didn't set up a logic chain which fails if any links are missing. So, he pretends that if people generally claim some "belief in god", then whatever characteristics he's assigned to that belief are automatically true. Part of his problem shows up in the language choice "...labeled good or bad..." which encapsulates the idea that reality is merely what you can call it without being shouted down while simultaneously dismissing the idea that good and bad can have any meaning beyond having been used as "labels". What follows from that is his attempt to label "belief in god" and to assign characteristics with no reference to reality. Clearly, if there were any widespread religious belief, in any denomination, which mirrored his claims it would be quite extraordinary. Equally clear is that no society can EVER operate based on the principle that people are not responsible for their actions. And when challenged to show any religion which teaches this, any religious figures who teach this he slips and slides and dissembles and lies and gaslights. And my honest opinion of why you don't get that that's what he's saying is that it's literally too stupid an opinion for you to actually believe anyone actually has.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
sonatime
·
10/9/2026, 8:12:55 AM
·
permalink
Thanks for the clarifying update. The inconsistencies I noticed often fell in line with prioritizing “winning,” or overwhelming the debate, over sincere reflection or truth seeking. After this long, though, I’ve mostly accepted the status quo:)
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
