soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: About the historical relationship of Islam to the United States
·
In Reply To
resolutionaryman
·
5/18/2026, 2:47:36 AM
·
permalink
I think we agree more than we disagree. For me, the boundary lies entirely between delegation and augmentation. If someone uses AI to think for them, I share your concern. But if it’s used to accelerate the articulation, organization, and exploration of ideas a person already holds, it becomes a cognitive lever—no different than a calculator for an engineer or a word processor for a writer. You made a great point that AI output often feels "not enough like you." I agree completely. Left to its own devices, AI produces sterile fluff. The tool only becomes meaningful when a human actively shapes, rejects, redirects, and curates it until it accurately reflects their intent. To use a culinary parallel: a master chef might use a food processor or a sous-vide machine to eliminate manual friction, but the presence of the machinery doesn't dictate the recipe. The tool doesn't tell you where the judgment resided. As for why someone wouldn’t “just go chat with an AI directly”—people could also read raw encyclopedias instead of talking to a teacher, or read blueprints instead of hiring an architect. We don't seek out creators for raw data; we seek them out for perspective, lived experience, taste, and accountability. An AI can generate information, but it cannot live a life.
Save
Cancel
5
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
5/18/2026, 4:14:25 AM
·
permalink
All analogies are flawed by nature. Criticizing someone for using an imprecise analogy isn't particularly apt. I don't feel as though your analogies here are really apt either, though I appreciate that coming up with apt ones would be really difficult. I just came off of an AI trying to make me it's tool, to be a bit hyperbolic. In one of my previous lives I wrote or spoke for other people, attempting to convey thoughts they wished they'd come up with on their own. One was a radio interview where I all but took over for the guy who was supposedly being interviewed, much to the gratitude of both the host and the subject of the interview. But, here's the thing. The thoughts expressed in that interview were mine, regardless how entirely the alleged subject agreed to them. That's a really weird situation to be in. To realize the guy they're listening to is actually "saying" your words. Sure, he agreed. Sure, I was the "tool" in this scenario. But, here's the thing. It wasn't him. It was me. And when I generate an AI artifact, so far; that's not me. Or at least that's not sufficiently me. I'm not quite getting that you understand I'm not so much as even questioning your use of these tools. I'm just telling you what I think most people are thinking, probably subconsciously and at least beyond their ability to articulate properly. And, I write slowly. Because it's just me.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
resolutionaryman
·
5/18/2026, 6:47:44 AM
·
permalink
You do you. Peace.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
