Comment on No Virus. No vaccine Necessary. THIS is the truth that OBLITERATES Vaccine Fandom by erindipitty

Parent Post: No Virus. No vaccine Necessary. THIS is the truth that OBLITERATES Vaccine Fandom · In Reply To

erindipitty · 3/27/2025, 1:50:13 PM · permalink

14 bumps

saarnok · 3/28/2025, 11:42:20 PM · permalink

10 bumps

erindipitty · 3/29/2025, 12:42:09 AM · permalink

9 bumps

saarnok · 3/29/2025, 11:45:53 PM · permalink

6 bumps

erindipitty · 3/31/2025, 12:42:09 PM · permalink

5 bumps

saarnok · 3/31/2025, 2:42:32 PM · permalink

No, I'm completely aware of Cowan's position, which I don't think is unique or original to him, and I'm quite well aware of scurvy (and some others). Don't know if you're familiar with the website [viroliegy.com](https://viroliegy.com/2022/02/28/documenting-the-virus-lie/), or if you've read Suzanne Humphries book: [Dissolving Illusions](https://dissolvingillusions.com/), but I've been looking into the field of medicine with a skeptical eye for over thirty years, usually sporadically, but sometimes almost obsessively.  
  
20 years ago I was fairly comfortable with my take on history and how much I could trust "science" when JP Hogan released "Kicking The Sacred Cow" which happened to include a section about AIDS in which he claimed that newspaper articles about AIDS are always *predicting* future AIDS cases in the millions or billions. Over the next couple of years I began clipping newspaper articles and slipping them into the pages of that book.  
  
I'm ranging rather far afield here, but the point is I'm probably not going to be surprised by anything you bring up.  
  
The issue is that, let's say "Roy" believes hackers have "infected" his PC with a virus and I can demonstrate (somehow) that this isn't the case. That doesn't explain why his computer is messed up. Unless I can show him why and how HIS computer, not someone else's in different circumstances got messed up, then he's still not going to be able to move away from the ONLY way he has to think about it.  
  
Forget "viruses", forget "germs", something which SEEMS to transfer (unpredictably) from human to human SEEMS to cause some (not all) disease conditions. No one's worried about 'catching' a broken bone and when we see someone living in filth we don't generally imagine whatever's wrong with them is somehow going to transfer to us. We're not nearly as bad at discerning when we should be concerned or not as some people think.  
  
If I've been taking care of myself the way I always should but often do not, then I'm pretty much immune to whatever is "going around". If I treat myself the way I never should but often do then I'm relatively vulnerable.  
  
I'm a long, long, looong way past believing I can go to a doctor and get some "medicine" to correct whatever problems I have, but I fall well short of buying there's no such thing as contagion. I've just seen it too many times.  
  
Is Cowan right that there are no viruses? Don't know. But, despite his demonstration that the science of virology is probably bunk he's not done more than prove the people involved in it are basically "wind readers" imagining they've determined an arcane way of reading sheets flapping in the breeze to predict the future while Tom exhaustively demonstrates they don't know what they're talking about and declares there is no wind, so they can't be reading it.  
  
I could go on, but I have other things to do this morning, and I need to get busy.

Signature