soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: The All-Encompassing Lord, King, God (One Creator God over all His creation)
·
In Reply To
tajudeen_bin_tijani
·
4/24/2026, 9:15:01 PM
·
permalink
dickie: Even if complications do not occur, the child has still lost bodily integrity, future choice, and an unaltered body for reasons unrelated to immediate medical need. Remember that there was the medical need for puberty blockers for 'Gender Dysphoria', can you reconcile this?
Save
Cancel
6
bumps
Share
dickie
·
4/24/2026, 9:20:50 PM
·
permalink
The doctors that provide medical interventions for 'Gender Dysphoria' should be put in prison or stoned.
Save
Cancel
5
bumps
Share
tajudeen_bin_tijani
·
4/24/2026, 9:23:05 PM
·
permalink
What criteria would you recommend for what falls on the right side of medical need?
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
dickie
·
4/24/2026, 9:33:04 PM
·
permalink
**Standard for Medical Intervention in Minors (High Bar for Interrupting Normal Body Functions)** **Baseline principle** Normal physiological processes (e.g., growth, puberty, development) should not be interrupted unless there is a clear, evidence-based medical justification. The default is preservation of natural function and deferral when safe. **Assessment criteria** 1. **Pathology threshold (not normal variation)** Intervention requires a diagnosed condition that departs from normal development (e.g., Central Precocious Puberty), not a typical, healthy process. 2. **Material risk of non-treatment** There must be a credible risk of significant harm if the condition is left untreated (functional impairment, long-term health consequences, or serious psychological deterioration). 3. **Necessity (not preference)** The intervention addresses a medical need, not cultural, cosmetic, or identity-based preference. 4. **Least-invasive effective option** Non-invasive or reversible options must be preferred and tried when appropriate before considering more invasive or function-interrupting treatments. 5. **Proportionality of risk and benefit** Expected benefits must clearly outweigh risks, including downstream effects on development (e.g., bone density, fertility, neurodevelopment). 6. **Reversibility and timing** If an intervention is irreversible—or alters a normal developmental trajectory—it should be deferred unless delay would cause greater harm. 7. **Evidence strength** Supported by high-quality, longitudinal evidence, not emerging or highly contested data. 8. **Independent, multidisciplinary review** Especially for interventions that interrupt normal functions, require evaluation by multiple specialists (e.g., pediatrics, endocrinology, mental health). 9. **Consent and assent** - Seek informed assent from the minor when possible. - Parental consent must be anchored to the child’s best medical interest, not external values. 10. **Best-interest standard** The child’s immediate and long-term welfare is the sole justification. External ideological, cultural, or social pressures are insufficient. **Implication** Under this standard, interrupting a normal, healthy bodily function carries a presumption against intervention. The burden of proof is high and must be met with clear, individualized, and evidence-based justification.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close