Comment on What are some conspiracy theories you don't believe to be true by logical

Parent Post: What are some conspiracy theories you don't believe to be true · In Reply To

logical · 3/29/2025, 8:07:15 PM · permalink

To Clarify.  And to save some time.  Anyone who wants to debate this moon landing hoax I will provide my most useful source.  
  
https://www.clavius.org/  
  
Yes I have seen Bart Sibrel, and many other moon hoax claims.  Yes I've seen the shadows, and the flag moving.  All the answers are at the above website with some searching.  The foot prints, the video angles, the shadows, everything is rigorously explained.  
```pre

```
**Now I'd like to discuss the Real Moon Landing Conspiracy.**
  
```code

```
  
  
in 1948 the State of Israel was created.  Also in 1948 the United Nations passed "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" which included the right to personal property and property ownership.  
  
This opened up legal justification for the removal of Palestine.  Amongst many other various international laws passed by the UN.  I am just summarizing and presenting a timeline of events not going into every detail.  
  
In 1967  The "**Outer Space Treaty**" aka *Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies.*  
  
  
Before these 2 specific treaties were signed, amongst many others including various UN International Laws.  
  
The land was ruled by "The Right of Conquest" ^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_conquest^  
  
*"The right of conquest was historically a right of ownership to land after immediate possession via force of arms. It was recognized as a principle of international law that gradually deteriorated in significance until its proscription in the aftermath of World War II following the concept of crimes against peace introduced in the Nuremberg Principles. The interdiction of territorial conquests was confirmed and broadened by the UN Charter, which provides in article 2, paragraph 4, that "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations." Nations that have resorted to the use of force since the Charter came into effect have typically invoked self-defense or the right of collective defense"*  
  
Basically the Right of conquest is Finders Keepers, whoever Plants the flag and defends the territory wins.  This is the basis of human civilization.  
  
**Now what happened in 1969**?   
  
The USA Planted the Flag of the United States of America on the Moon.  This mean's either via The Right of Conquest, or UN International LAW.  Whoever controls the USA &amp; UN Controls and owns the Moon.   
  
Any country trying to reach the moon is subject to military enforcement by the USA and UN.  Why doesn't China or Russia land on the Moon?  What is the point, they realize it is basically an Act of War.  There is nothing there they can claim.   
  
The Real goal here, as always, is to secure the resources of the Moon.  Specifically Helium^3^.  Also many other precious metals and minerals obviously as well.  But Helium3 Is most likely the future of energy production and space travel for Humanity imo.  
  
While the technology to mine the moon isn't quite yet developed.  It is on the way.  I believe in 10 years time Moon Mining will commence.  Once A.I and robotics can be engineered and commercially viably built.   
  
2030 Is a big date, It is the End of the International Space Station.  And likely we will see this trigger an event where many countries create new space stations, as Docking Ports and Storage facilities in-between Low Earth Orbit and the Moon.  *"Oh look the ISS crashed into the ocean, we must raise your taxes to build new space stations"*  
  
Feel free to rip me apart but, this is my feelings on the subject.  I have never been to space and I'm not a scientist or an astronaut.  Just a guy that notices things, and spends too much time looking into rabbit holes. @nevertheless @thoughtcriminal\_1984 @erindipitty  
  
Perhaps I should just make this it's own post somewhere though so everyone can attack me for believing in the Moon Landing.  Gets kinda sloppy in the comments.

4 bumps

logical · 3/29/2025, 8:13:10 PM · permalink

2 bumps

Signature