Comment on Okay, let’s find some common ground. by tajudeen_bin_tijani

Parent Post: Okay, let’s find some common ground. · In Reply To

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 4/27/2025, 12:58:24 PM · permalink

8 bumps

crimsonmvestro · 4/27/2025, 1:55:54 PM · permalink

Yes this is ChatGPT generated (to be upfront) but the idea is solid.   
  
Alright — if we imagine a world where everything in nature is free (land, trees, ores, water, etc.), and the only “cost” is human labor to transform it into useful things, here’s what such a system could look like:

⸻

1\. Labor as the Core “Currency”:

Instead of money, the main contribution expected from each person would be their time, skills, and effort. To have access to housing, food, clothing, and tools, a person would contribute labor to the community in some form. Not because they are paid — but because contributing is necessary for the society’s survival and mutual flourishing.

2\. Direct Work-Access System:

• If you work in farming, you get access to food.

• If you work in construction, you get access to housing.

• If you work in medicine, you get access to healthcare.

Each profession directly ties to real outputs, and sharing is communal because survival depends on it.

3\. Specialization and Cooperation:

People would choose roles based on skill, need, or interest. Specialists (like skilled builders, doctors, engineers) would still exist, but their prestige wouldn’t be about wealth — it would be about how much they contribute to the flourishing of the community.

4\. No Hoarding:

Since nature is abundant and nothing is sold for profit, hoarding resources would be meaningless. If someone stockpiled, the community would step in, because hoarding hurts the collective good.

5\. Distribution Based on Need and Contribution:

Things would be distributed based on need and fair contribution — not based on how much labor you can outcompete others with. For example, an elder who can no longer work full days would still be supported by the community without question.

6\. Conflict Resolution through Councils, not Markets:

Without prices or market forces, disputes (like “who gets this plot of land to farm?”) would be resolved by community councils or agreed systems of consensus and negotiation.

7\. Education as a Lifelong Duty:

Everyone would be taught from a young age that labor is sacred — not labor for exploitation, but labor as participation in the human project. Schools would prepare people to contribute with joy, responsibility, and creativity.

8\. Technology Development:

Labor-saving technologies would be pursued eagerly, but not to create unemployment — to liberate human time for more meaningful pursuits: art, exploration, science, philosophy.

9\. Culture of Gratitude, not Ownership:

Instead of “owning” a piece of land or object permanently, people would steward what they use, with a deep cultural respect for passing it to others after their time is done.

10\. Social Status tied to Contribution, Wisdom, and Character:

Social respect would not be about wealth accumulation. It would come from being an excellent weaver, a tireless healer, a wise mediator — a person who consistently gives to the common life.

⸻

In short:

• No buying and selling.

• No landlords, bankers, or employers in the profit-seeking sense.

• Labor is done because we are humans who need each other.

• Community life would be the center, not individual accumulation.

• Nature would be seen as a gift, not a commodity.

6 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 4/27/2025, 2:03:33 PM · permalink

5 bumps

privacyplease · 5/10/2025, 1:15:39 AM · permalink

2 bumps

tajudeen_bin_tijani · 5/10/2025, 8:48:15 AM · permalink

1 bump

crimsonmvestro · 4/27/2025, 2:04:34 PM · permalink

1 bump

Signature