soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Funny how your choice of words dictates your intent. Not really the other way around. Harmed. Not, Damaged.
tikvah
·
10/2/2026, 4:10:48 PM
·
permalink
With all due respect... I really like this distinction. “Damaged” makes a person sound like an object that has been broken and can no longer be what it was intended to be. “Harmed” tells a different story—it acknowledges that something happened \*to\* the person without making that experience their identity. And I especially appreciate what you said about recognition. Maybe healing begins when we can say, “Yes, I was harmed,” without having to conclude, “Therefore, I am damaged.” None of us comes through life untouched. We are all shaped by what happens to us, but we are not reducible to what happened to us. There is still choice, growth, teshuvah, and the possibility of becoming something new. And yes, I can say for myself, Tikvah was certainly shaped by some of those experiences—but I don't see myself as damaged goods. I see myself as still becoming. ❤️ Maybe that is the real difference: \*\*damage describes a condition; harm describes an experience.\*\* And an experience can become part of our story without becoming the definition of who we are.
Save
Cancel
5
bumps
Share
S
saarnok
·
10/2/2026, 9:39:11 PM
·
permalink
Well, now I really wish I'd included that line you added. "Harm describes an experience." But, I didn't think of it, so here we are. Maybe it's better that you included it so I could learn it.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close