Comment on USS Lincoln Returns Home by saarnok

Parent Post: USS Lincoln Returns Home · In Reply To

saarnok · 10/18/2026, 1:53:18 AM · permalink

That's the best laugh I've had today.  
  
No. In a weird way you can absolutely trust Trump. I think.  
  
No specific braggadocios thing he says matters in specificity. What he's conveying does. He's conveying that Iran will no longer control oil shipments in the world and will no longer be allowed to in the most thinly veiled fashion fund terrorist groups throughout the world with impunity.  
  
He's conveyed with his actions that China will no longer have direct access to terrorist regimes, exchanging shoddy tech for oil and making inroads against the West; again, in the most thinly veiled fashion with impunity.  
  
And, I'd say he's at the very least, mostly successful in his efforts.  
  
Would Trump order the bombing of a school building to break the London cartel? Maybe. I would. But, I'd have to have an irrational level of certainty about the result.  
  
So, no, I can assure you, while the Israeli's had a motive to bomb the school, or more accurately, get the school bombed; while the Iranians had the best motive to bomb the school; I don't see how bombing the school could possibly benefit the administration.  
  
My personal opinion is the Iranians not only did bomb the school, they'd always planned to do so in event of an attack on the military base they made it a part of. That's why it was there in the first place. Obviously. There literally couldn't be another explanation that makes any sense.  
  
Questioning the results is perfectly fine. In fact it's the only rational way to approach the situation. The question is: What results?  
  
What game is even being played here? And, who are the players?  
  
You should at least be curious as to why it is that you don't hear about the ten thousand atrocities of the Ukraine war (and I assure you there are at least that many to report on), but your attention is always drawn to the campaign that has Trump's name stamped on it?  
  
You'd have to clarify that last point a bit before I could even intelligently comment on it.

2 bumps

dickie · 10/18/2026, 2:42:17 PM · permalink

**OFFICE OF UNINTENTIONAL COMEDY**
Bureau of Geopolitical Absurdity and Internet Discourse

**OFFICIAL COMEDY ASSESSMENT REPORT**

Report No.: OUC-2026-1018
Date: October 18, 2026
Subject: Donald Trump, Iran, elementary schools and maritime insurance
Classification: PUBLIC / UNINTENTIONAL
Review Type: Independent Satirical Assessment

---

Following a comprehensive review of the subject's commentary concerning the U.S.-Iran war, the Office of Unintentional Comedy has determined that the submission represents an exceptional achievement in accidental political satire.

The subject successfully combined contradictory reasoning, unsupported conspiracy theories, speculative military strategy and an unsolicited willingness to bomb an elementary school into a single geopolitical analysis.

Most remarkably, the entire presentation was delivered with apparent sincerity.

**FINAL COMEDY RATING: 9.4/10**
**GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS: 2.5/10**

The subject demonstrates advanced proficiency in generating comedy without apparent intent to do so.

**Performance Evaluation:**

- Absurdity: 10/10
- Unintentional irony: 10/10
- Narrative plot twists: 9/10
- Straight-faced delivery: 10/10
- Self-awareness: 3/10
- Accidental satire: 10/10

**Finding 1: The Trump Reliability Paradox**

The subject asserts that Donald Trump can be trusted while simultaneously explaining that his actual statements cannot be relied upon.

Under this framework, presidential statements need not correspond to reality, predictions need not materialize and stated objectives need not reflect actual objectives.

The subject has developed a system in which being wrong is potentially the highest form of being right.

Comedy Assessment: Exceptional.

**Finding 2: The Maritime Insurance Plot Twist**

The subject proposes that the underlying strategic objective of the Iran war involves breaking the influence of international maritime insurance interests.

This introduces an entirely unexpected antagonist into the conflict: Lloyd's of London.

After seven months of missiles, drones, naval engagements and economic disruption, the true enemy has apparently been identified as an insurance underwriter.

The Office recommends further investigation into whether aircraft carriers will begin displaying small insurance policy cancellation symbols alongside their kill markings.

Comedy Assessment: Outstanding narrative originality.

**Finding 3: The Elementary School Theory**

The subject voluntarily acknowledges that he might consider bombing a school under certain strategic circumstances.

He then expresses confidence that Trump would not have ordered such an attack, while advancing the theory that Iran deliberately killed its own schoolchildren.

His confidence rests primarily on his inability to imagine an alternative explanation.

This is especially noteworthy because the discussion already contains references to investigations identifying American Tomahawk missiles and targeting failures.

The subject demonstrates an impressive ability to dismiss documented investigative findings while treating personal imagination as a superior intelligence source.

Comedy Assessment: Maximum absurdity.

**Finding 4: The Unexpected Ukraine Maneuver**

While discussing an article about Iranian propaganda and kill markings aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, the subject abruptly introduces atrocities in Ukraine.

This maneuver is particularly creative because it criticizes another participant for discussing Iran in a thread specifically about Iran.

The Office could identify no operational necessity for Ukraine's sudden deployment into the conversation.

Comedy Assessment: Advanced conversational misdirection.

**Finding 5: The Epistemological Contradiction**

The subject argues that contemporary events cannot truly be understood until historians examine them decades later.

He simultaneously expresses extraordinary certainty regarding Trump's hidden objectives, Iran's alleged motives and the supposed outcome of a geopolitical campaign against the maritime insurance industry.

The subject apparently possesses privileged knowledge that nobody can know anything, except himself.

Comedy Assessment: Exceptional.

**Finding 6: The Intelligent Commentary Announcement**

The subject concludes by indicating that clarification would be necessary before he could "intelligently comment."

This represents the strongest comedic moment in the submission.

After an extended demonstration of speculative reasoning, the subject unexpectedly reveals that intelligent commentary was apparently still under consideration.

Comedy Assessment: 10/10.

The announcement establishes an entirely new expectation for future participation.

**SPECIAL RECOGNITION: THE PEE-WEE HERMAN STRATEGIC DOCTRINE AWARD**

Presented for outstanding achievement in retroactively redefining an unexpected outcome as the intended objective.

Doctrine: "I meant to do that!"

Application: Trump predicted a four-to-five-week war. Seven and a half months later, continued hostilities and shipping disruptions are reinterpreted as potential evidence of a sophisticated, previously undisclosed plan.

Under this doctrine, no unfavorable outcome can conclusively establish failure because the actual objective may be invented afterward.

Pee-wee Herman only needed to convince people he meant to crash his bicycle.

The subject is attempting to establish that the bicycle was engaged in eight-dimensional chess with Lloyd's of London.

**FINAL DETERMINATION**

The Office concludes that the subject's commentary qualifies as elite-tier unintentional geopolitical comedy.

The performance is distinguished by its ambitious scope, unexpected plot developments and remarkable resistance to contradictory evidence.

A perfect score was narrowly avoided due to one unresolved issue:

**The subject failed to establish whether the 123 Iranian schoolchildren were insured by Lloyd's of London.**

Until this critical connection is explained, the proposed relationship between elementary school bombings and international maritime insurance remains insufficiently developed.

**FINAL RATING: 9.4/10**

Status: Comedy confirmed. Strategic brilliance unverified.

Recommendation: Preserve the original submission for future study. Discourage revisions, as additional factual accuracy could compromise its comedic value.

This report is a work of satire evaluating the arguments presented, not an official government investigation.

**END OF REPORT**

1 bump

Signature