soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Part 2 - It wasn't limited to the soj.ooo Privacy Policy. The ToS were silently with egregious anti-user clauses
·
In Reply To
float4
·
2/4/2026, 11:09:25 AM
·
permalink
Notice my statements are brief.
Save
Cancel
4
bumps
Share
H
hyokkim
·
2/4/2026, 11:19:25 AM
·
permalink
Per your logic, sojoo could 'see' your draft, whatever you had written before posting. Just posting at sojoo puts you at risk. Maybe you did not mean what you had said. You were just trying to look 'smart' by pretending your 'cynicism', speculating Matt is dumb enough to be intimidated by your 'cynicism'. Dude, you are trying too hard to play a cynic. Smart people already know you're just play acting, and not being very mature.
Save
Cancel
3
bumps
Share
float4
·
2/4/2026, 12:44:23 PM
·
permalink
There is no speculation from me. Just a bad business decision that should be reconsidered. I didn't call anyone dumb, you're making that leap.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
H
hyokkim
·
2/4/2026, 8:24:51 PM
·
permalink
''There is no speculation from me. Just a bad business decision that should be reconsidered.'' Why is it a bad decision to refuse to be accountable for the mistake a user makes? ''I didn't call anyone dumb, you're making that leap.'' I said you thought Matt was dumb enough to be intimidated by your phony cynicism; I did not say you called Matt dumb. You are the one making that leap. ''Per your logic, sojoo could 'see' your draft, whatever you had written before posting. Just posting at sojoo puts you at risk.'' - Hyok Kim Since you continue to post here, knowing you are taking risks not worth taking, maybe you're the dumb one? Why should Matt be responsible for the mistake made by a dumb user?
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
