soj.ooO
BETA
The social discussion platform
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Sign up
Home
Pochas
Channels
Videos
Log in
Sign up
Parent Post: Vibration, frequency and energy...
·
In Reply To
j.k.harwood2
·
3/5/2025, 6:58:46 PM
·
permalink
You're raising some thought-provoking points, and I appreciate the spirit of inquiry. Let's break this down carefully. Tesla and the Human Body It’s not accurate to say that Nikola Tesla didn’t explore the human body. While he was primarily known for electrical engineering and physics, he deeply studied bioelectricity and the electromagnetic nature of life itself. Tesla’s work on energy, vibration, and frequency touches on how electricity interacts with biological systems. He even predicted wireless energy transmission for medical purposes, an area that continues to be explored in bioelectromagnetics today. The Bible and the Architect While the Bible does not explicitly use the term "Architect," it does, in fact, present God as the ultimate designer of creation. Proverbs 8:27-30 speaks of divine wisdom being present "when He established the heavens." Hebrews 11:10 refers to God as the "architect and builder" of a heavenly city. The entire structure of biblical creation presents intelligent, purposeful design. Zoroastrianism vs. Biblical Truth It’s true that Zoroastrianism emphasizes a moral code of “Think Good, Speak Good, Do Good,” but the idea that this predates or supersedes biblical truth is incorrect. The Bible establishes moral law long before Zoroastrianism (e.g., in Genesis, God commands righteousness; in Exodus, the Ten Commandments). Many ancient religions borrowed from biblical principles or ran parallel due to humanity’s shared origins. The Bible, however, grounds morality in a personal, living God, not just in an abstract principle of "Good." Creation, Sound, and Light You’re absolutely onto something regarding the connection between sound and creation. The Bible explicitly states, “God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light” (Genesis 1:3). This affirms that divine speech initiated creation. The Big Bang theory (if correctly interpreted) echoes this concept, as it proposes an initial moment of expansion that could correlate with divine command. However, where deception enters is in the assumption that impersonal, unguided forces alone account for creation. The Bible makes it clear that a conscious Creator spoke the universe into existence—not randomness. Finding the Original Source The original source of truth is knowable—it is God Himself, revealed through Scripture and through Jesus Christ (John 14:6). The deception is not in the Bible, but in the world’s attempts to distort or discredit it. If we seek truth, we will find it (Jeremiah 29:13), but it requires discernment to separate divine wisdom from human reinterpretations. I appreciate the dialogue and the search for deeper understanding. Truth stands firm, and working together, we can uncover more of it. Peace and wisdom to you.
Save
Cancel
2
bumps
Share
braven
·
3/5/2025, 8:13:17 PM
·
permalink
I appreciate your take on this...and well written. I agree with most of your assertions, even where we may seem to advance alternate theories...all good. Not sure about your take on what originated first. Certainly, Zoroastrianism came as the first Monotheistic approach. The others are like bad sequels. This will be contentious for sure, so I am not arguing this point. Just making the claim that we really do not know. The part that I would challenge you on is God. The deception is in the Bible...it is full of them...regardless of who is doing the interpreting. But if you are holding onto the idea that the Bible should be trusted, I would simply ask why? "The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd." Bertrand Russel. My point is...we can do better. God is not good, and the Bible gives numerous accounts of God behaving miserably. If there is such a thing as "God", we should let "him" speak for himself. Why does he need help? As for Tesla, he did amazing things, yet he did not realize the importance of embodying "warrior" like health. This was similar to Nietzsche, but Nietzsche was really sick and took that hard...quite bitter and resentful....for good reasons. It really does seem like we need a new religion...without God pestering our Good work. Something like that. Again, you are making good points, and your insights are greatly appreciated. Peace.
Save
Cancel
1
bump
Share
Signature
Loading…
Verify locally
Close
