Comment on ISLAM & Satanisim by sacredcow

Parent Post: ISLAM & Satanisim

sacredcow · 11/26/2025, 9:43:17 AM · permalink

54 bumps

allendaves · 11/28/2025, 11:36:18 PM · permalink

52 bumps

sacredcow · 11/29/2025, 3:30:33 PM · permalink

34 bumps

allendaves · 11/29/2025, 4:44:50 PM · permalink

1) "THE PROBLEM OF 'EVIL'"

God created life &amp; yes even the place called the grave, sheol or condition of death itself. it was God who created the choices &amp; consequences that created the human death experiance. It was God that created bacteria and poisonous plants &amp; animals and even the devils. God is not evil.because God defines what evil is &amp; assigns who is responsible for it.

A) Understand that "evil"( &amp; there are different kinds) even accountability &amp; responsibility are also creations-definitions that belong to God &amp; God defines... God is not subject to responsibility, accountability, blame external of his own determinations-definitions -asignment to.

B) Further there is no fundimental difference between God sending disease or vipers or animals or "plain Jane" ordinary "old age", angel of death OR commanding the Israelites to put everyone to the sword including men women and babbies too! Dead Is dead. &amp; God determines when &amp; how all humans die!!....The OT issue was always about obediance to Gods commands NOT morality of God. 😅 God invented morality &amp; mortality! He defines morality HE is not judged by any moral code. He is the codes source origine &amp; defines that code as well as ascribe who is responsible to that code.. He is the master of Life and of death. God determined all men to die. God could have made a way for humans to live forever but GOD DOESNT WANT HUMANS ALIVE FOREVER!! Killing humans with death is death no matter how God chooses to make men die..... so just stop it, God is not responsible for evil because 9nl6 he can legitimately define evil or blame, responsibility, accountabillity...... God is NOT your "buddy" not your peer nor a man nor angel to be judged &amp; evaluated &amp; critiqued.... 🤣

Conclusion:

SO THE FACT THAT GOD ORDERED GENOCIDED MEANS NOTHING SILLY BILLY !

THE PROBLEM IS JUST LIKE SATAN PEOPLE DONT GRASP WHO OR WHAT GOD IS WHICH IS WHY SATAN THOUGHT THAT GOD WAS LIKE HIMSELF AND COULD BE OUTSMARTED.🤭

....THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE GOD &amp; CREATOR OF ALL THINGS. This is what people don't rightly grasp. God is NOT accountable to anyone! God holds title to all concepts all "persons" and all laws. God owes you or any entity NOTHING!!!

https://www.scribd.com/document/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell

https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

12 bumps

sacredcow · 11/30/2025, 11:51:42 AM · permalink

11 bumps

allendaves · 11/30/2025, 6:36:10 PM · permalink

10 bumps

sacredcow · 12/1/2025, 1:28:00 PM · permalink

8 bumps

allendaves · 12/1/2025, 8:34:39 PM · permalink

7 bumps

sacredcow · 12/2/2025, 12:36:21 PM · permalink

6 bumps

allendaves · 12/2/2025, 5:49:15 PM · permalink

5 bumps

sacredcow · 12/3/2025, 1:21:53 PM · permalink

4 bumps

allendaves · 12/3/2025, 8:11:04 PM · permalink

3 bumps

sacredcow · 12/4/2025, 1:29:39 PM · permalink

1 bump

sacredcow · 12/4/2025, 1:28:20 PM · permalink

1 bump

gracejoy · 11/29/2025, 5:45:50 PM · permalink

"*...your 'moral' god sends two she bears to murder 42 youths ... \[b/c\] they called a dude 'baldy'...*"  
  
**2 Kings 2:24** And \[Elisha\] turned around &amp; saw them, &amp; he cursed them in the name of God. And two she-bears came out of the forest and tore apart forty-two boys of them.  
  
I found four parts to another interpretation: **1**) The Hebrew phrase is not necessarily "youths"; **2**) the location was a hotbed of idolatry; **3**) the reason for the verbal assault was not simply disrespect of God's prophet Elisha's "bald" head; **4**) &amp; Elisha cursed them in the Name of God b/c, as a prophet, he could see what normal men couldn't.  
  
**1**) This Christian site says **[the Hebrew phrase](https://www.1517.org/articles/the-misunderstood-story-of-bear-attacks-a-bald-prophet-and-forty-two-mouthy-kids)** "**is a combination of the noun na‘ar &amp; the adjective qatan**. ...**na‘ar**, . often rendered as children/boys.. ..\[It\] **can denote everyone from baby Moses** (**Exod. 2:6**) **to fully-grown Absalom** (**2 Sam. 14:21**). A na‘ar can also designate **a servant** (**Gen. 22:3**), **armor-bearer** (**Judges 9:54**), **king’s official** (**2 Kings 19:6**), &amp;. a **priest** (**1 Sam. 2:17**). ... **qatan**, means small, little, or young . \[but\] how young? This same Hebrew combination, **na‘ar qatan, is used to describe a mature rebel named Hadad the Edomite** (**1 Kings 11:17**). Likewise, when **Solomon** takes the throne **at about the age of twenty**, he describes himself as a na‘ar qaton (**1 Kings 3:7**)."  
.  
**2**) **&amp; 3**) [**Chabad cites Rashi**](https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/15908/showrashi/true), that the term means "people empty \[of any observance of commandments\]." Also, the water was bad (causing people to die) until God sweetened it through Elisha. "'*Go away from here, for you have made the place bald for us, for until now we would hire ourselves out to bring sweet water from a distance, &amp; we would earn our livelihood thereby*.' And when the water became sweet, they lost their livelihood." The part of **the Talmud Rashi referenced elaborates on their** **nature, a corruption that would remain even w/their descendants**:  
  
**4**) Linked from Chabad: "The Gemara asks: **What did** \[**Elisha**\] **see?** There are four explanations offered. **Rav** says: He literally saw, i.e., **he stared &amp; bored his eyes into them**, as it is taught in a baraita: **Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says**: Wherever it states that the Sages placed their eyes upon a certain person, they brought upon that person either death or poverty. And **Shmuel says**: He saw their essential nature, that all their mothers became pregnant with them on Yom Kippur, when conjugal relations are forbidden.

"And **Rabbi Yitzḥak Nappaḥa says**: He saw that they had plaited locks grown on the back of their heads like the gentiles. And **Rabbi Yoḥanan says**: He saw that they did not contain even a smidgen of a mitzva. The Gemara raises an objection to this last interpretation of Rabbi Yoḥanan: But how could he curse them just because they did not have any mitzvot? Perhaps their descendants would have many mitzvot. **Rabbi Elazar says**: **\[Elisha\] saw that mitzvot would be found neither in them nor in their descendants, through all generations**."

21 bumps

sacredcow · 11/30/2025, 11:36:25 AM · permalink

11 bumps

gracejoy · 11/30/2025, 1:44:01 PM · permalink

10 bumps

sacredcow · 12/1/2025, 1:45:08 PM · permalink

8 bumps

gracejoy · 12/2/2025, 3:28:26 AM · permalink

7 bumps

sacredcow · 12/2/2025, 12:32:24 PM · permalink

6 bumps

gracejoy · 12/3/2025, 2:11:19 AM · permalink

5 bumps

Signature